[zappo]

Quote:

---

M0rph3v5 opened his big mouth to say:
don't you want the screen to be blurred a little bit when moving around too fast, seems real <insert crysis motion blur realism joke here>

---

If the film blurs then its suppose to blur. It is inherent to the source. Bluring from the television is an issue inherent to lcd displays. Plasma has no such issues and therefor I could never recommend buying an lcd tv. People seem to mix up the soap opera effect with everything so I was just pointing out there is a big difference. I trust peter jackson he knows what he is doing. Still I am fond of 24 fps.

[Jabe Jackman]

Good LCDs don't have that issue either

[zappo]

Quote:

---

Jabe Jackman opened his big mouth to say:
Good LCDs don't have that issue either

---

False. To my knowledge all LCD's have some sort of motion filtering. Only certain brands allow you to disable it. Most of those are higher in the price range and for the price you pay for that you can just obtain a plasma that shits on it.

[Jabe Jackman]

I use an Aquos for my monitor and I never notice any ghosting. I guess it might be something you only see when you compare it though

[karl101]

Zappo speaks the truth tbh.

[Jabe Jackman]

I'm not disagreeing, I've never bothered to check out the comparison for myself.

[zappo]

If you do not notice it god bless you. I unfortunately can notice and did way to much research prior to choosing a television. Overall tho it was time well spent as I could not be happier with the set I picked. Also I am pretty sure you may not notice it because you are using it as a monitor. To my knowledge typically the input device has to dictate to utilize 24p for movie playback. Then again if you never saw the difference your not going to know the difference.

[NickJames?]

90% of the time you can disable it. My Samsung does and so does my LG. I leave it on when watched animated movies.

[karl101]

Quote:

---

Jabe Jackman opened his big mouth to say:
I'm not disagreeing, I've never bothered to check out the comparison for myself.

---

it's pretty noticable tbh, with motion smoothing off a movie looks like it should, with it turned on it looks like you're watching a live play.

[3dAnimator]

Quote:

---

M0rph3v5 opened his big mouth to say:
he sure lost some weight

---

he had his stomach stapled, cheating really.

actually the pic looks like in photoshop someone did a scale -1/2 on the x axis


the reason for the 48 fps is to have better feeling on the Stereo 3d... like in games ( I had stereo on unreal 2 with this http://www.edimensional.com/ yeas ago on my crt monitor)

and a refresh rate of 60 hz was painfull, faster refresh rate ( real not just projection rate ) makes a whole lot of difference.

that's what Peter Jackson is trying to do... reduce audience headaches.

and it's true that 24fps is an arbitrary number,
it came to be because it's the smallest amount of fps that would work with lipsynch on sound films when talkies started.

before that some silent films where shot at 16 fps to save costly film negative.

[NickJames?]

I don't mind in most movies, BOB looks awesome to me at 60hz, especially in the winter snowing scenes. It's like looking through a window.

[Jabe Jackman]

Quote:

---

3dAnimator opened his big mouth to say:

Quote:

---

M0rph3v5 opened his big mouth to say:
he sure lost some weight

---

he had his stomach stapled, cheating really.

actually the pic looks like in photoshop someone did a scale -1/2 on the x axis


the reason for the 48 fps is to have better feeling on the Stereo 3d... like in games ( I had stereo on unreal 2 with this http://www.edimensional.com/ yeas ago on my crt monitor)

and a refresh rate of 60 hz was painfull, faster refresh rate ( real not just projection rate ) makes a whole lot of difference.

that's what Peter Jackson is trying to do... reduce audience headaches.

and it's true that 24fps is an arbitrary number,
it came to be because it's the smallest amount of fps that would work with lipsynch on sound films when talkies started.

before that some silent films where shot at 16 fps to save costly film negative.

---

Looks more like someone went into photoshop and used the Hobbit filter.

[^Ben]

http://www.slashfilm.com/cameron/

There's a couple of good articles out there about this.

[Jabe Jackman]

It makes a lot of sense. It's kind of like how you turn up time steps in motion blur to make it not look linear.

[M0rph3v5]

stop posting here until a new vlog tbh, each time i'm hoping when entering this thread.